A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering the fact that turn out to be emblematic on the intensity from the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water in the course of extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the internet site grew to become Probably the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment inside the authorized timeline.
Within the core with the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as produced, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and problems hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got described their long-standing relationship to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on René Collier their own as a few simply attempting to develop a family members house in accordance With all the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been carried out dependant on professional advice and authorised designs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea through a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for your circumstance that many observers see as significantly frequent. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier noted which the businessman had Earlier been involved with neighborhood advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite different Qualified backgrounds can find on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both equally the physical fact from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an abnormal approach.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to figure out whether the wall as crafted complies with arranging permission and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Still the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the authorized costs have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design operates at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the case prolong outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the value of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental concerns including environmental safety and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Irrespective of whether it will finally be altered, eliminated, or finished as prepared will depend on the courtroom’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable go on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin recently.